Disinformation gets worse

“We’re in a terrifying moment where our global information streams are polluted with a dizzying array of mis- and disinformation. Politicians are targeting the professional media as a way of building direct connections with citizens through social media.”

In 2017, I certainly wouldn’t have predicted the term “fake news” would become so stretched and contorted as to render it utterly meaningless, much less weaponized by world leaders. I wouldn’t have predicted so little concrete action had been taken to mitigate information pollution globally. I also wouldn’t have predicted the scale of coordinated media and platform manipulation.

So with these caveats, here are my predictions for 2018, and some suggestions for remedying the problem that I wish I could predict to happen.

The term “f*** news” will continue to be peppered into news articles, used by editors who claim SEO leaves them no choice, and added to academic articles by researchers riding a trend in hopes for more grant money. It will appear in government inquiries that want to seem relevant, and will continue to be weaponized by politicians wanting to undermine the media and, ultimately, free speech.

I wish I could predict that in 2018 most people would use more nuanced terms to describe different types of mis- and disinformation.

Visual disinformation will become much more prevalent, partly because agents of disinformation will recognize its power to instantly fire up emotions, evade tripping critical engagement from the brain, and be consumed directly from the News Feed. Visuals are also much harder to monitor and analyze computationally.

Technology companies are working on solutions to these challenges, and I wish I could predict that this subject would become a global research and technological priority so we might have a comprehensive solution to visual disinformation in the next twelve months.

Computational techniques that allow realistic audio, still images, and video to be automatically manipulated or created are just in its infancy, but reporting on these technologies will begin to have a significant impact on people’s trust in audio and visual evidence. Politicians will claim negative clips of them were manipulated or fabricated. We won’t see a major successful hoax using this technology in 2018. But despite that, we will spend a lot of time writing about it, raising fear and potentially jeopardizing people’s trust in audio and visual materials.

I wish I could predict fewer of these types of stories.

Techniques to manipulate platforms and the media will become much more sophisticated. There will not be enough engineers at the technology companies, nor enough reporters at news organizations, assigned to monitor these techniques. Most senior staff will continue to lack a serious understanding of how these systematic disinformation campaigns are damaging their respective industries.

I wish I could predict that technology companies and news organizations would begin to share “intelligence,” becoming much more aware of the consequences of publishing, linking to, or in any way amplifying mis- and disinformation.

Though media companies may not effectively combat disinformation, they will continue to report about disinformation and use headlines with terms like bots, Russia, cybersecurity, hacking, and fake news to generate traffic. Though the news industry will continue to use these terms, it will not explain them responsibly. Moreover, senior editors will not consider how these terms might affect the public’s trust in democratic systems and the media itself. The race for clicks may have some unintended consequences at the ballot box in elections.

I wish I could predict more nuanced reporting on disinformation that has considered the potential unintended consequences of these types of stories.

Governments around the world will continue to hold “fake news” inquiries, and some will pass knee-jerk, ill-informed regulation that will do little — or worse, suppress free speech. If a European government passes a well-intentioned law, a regime far away will use the precedent to pass similar legislation aiming to stifle what it decides is “fake news.”

I wish I could predict a truly global, regulatory conversation which recognises the cultural, legal, and ethical complexities of dealing with mis- and disinformation.

Most governments will continue to work independently on information literacy programs, despite the fact that a truly global response to this problem is required. Programs will not fully incorporate materials on the impact of big data, algorithmic power, ethical considerations of publishing or sharing information, or emotional skepticism. The programs will not be future-proofed, as they will not adequately focus on making sense of information in augmented and virtual reality environments.

I wish I could predict a global coalition bringing together the smartest minds, along with the best content creators from all companies from Netflix to Snapchat, to create information “literacy” content of global relevance.

Philanthropic organizations will continue to give relatively small grants to independent projects, meaning the scale and global nature of this problem will not be adequately addressed.

I wish I could predict the creation of a significant global fund that is supported by money donated by governments, the technology companies, and philanthropists, and is managed by a coalition of organizations and advisors.

Closed messaging apps will become even more prevalent than they are today (which is already significant in a number of countries in Latin America and Asia-Pacific). We will continue to be blind to what is being shared and will therefore be ill-equipped to debunk rumours and fabricated content spreading on these platforms.

I wish I could predict that there would be a significant, new focus on studying these apps, and testing experimental methods for effectively slowing down the sharing of mis- and disinformation on them.

Anger at technology companies will continue to rise. Consequently, platforms will be less likely to collaborate.

I wish I could predict that there would be greater moves towards transparency that involves greater data sharing, independent auditing, and collaborations with trusted academic partners.

I am unapologetic about the depressing nature of these predictions. We’re in a terrifying moment where our global information streams are polluted with a dizzying array of mis- and disinformation. Politicians are targeting the professional media as a way of building direct connections with citizens through social media. Journalists and platforms are being targeted and manipulated by agents of disinformation who crave and require the credibility that comes with their exposure. Political polarization is creating dangerous schisms in societies worldwide, and the speed of technological advancements is making manipulation increasingly difficult to detect. These are all reasons to be depressed.

It doesn’t have to be this dire. As outlined here, if everything I wish I could predict actually happens, we might have a fighting chance. I would love to be proved wrong.

Claire Wardle is strategy and research director of First Draft News and a research fellow at the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard Kennedy School.

Neha Gandhi   Filler killers

Kyle Ellis   Let’s build our way out of this

Raney Aronson-Rath   Transparency is the antidote to fake news

Sydette Harry   Listen to your corner and watch for the hook

Sam Sanders   Shine the light on ourselves

Matt Boggie   The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea

Rodney Gibbs   Tech workers turn to journalism

Carrie Brown-Smith   Transparency finally takes off

Marie Gilot   No assholes allowed

Sarah Marshall   Loyalty as the key performance indicator

Andrew Haeg   The year journalists become relationship builders

Paul Ford   Go global

Cory Haik   Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact

Brian Lam   Sketchy ethics around product reviews

Nushin Rashidian   Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives

Molly de Aguiar   Good journalism won’t be enough

Luke O'Neil   The end is already here

Amy Webb   Listen to weak signals

Matt DeRienzo   A recession, then a collapse

Eric Ulken   The year local publishers get smart(er) about change

Imaeyen Ibanga   Longform video leads the way

Dannagal G. Young   Stop covering politics as a game

Dan Shanoff   You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)

Andrew Losowsky   The year of resilience

Michael Kuntz   The only pivot that might work

Monika Bauerlein   The firehose of falsehood

Cristina Wilson   The year of the Instagram Story

Jessica Parker Gilbert   Design connects storytelling and strategy

Ariana Tobin   Too tired to tap

Jesse Holcomb   Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you

Alastair Coote   The year of self-improvement

Usha Sahay   Wallets get opened

Sue Schardt   Jump the niche

Felix Salmon   Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin

Edward Roussel   Eyes, ears, and brains

Will Sommer   The year local media gets conservative

John Keefe   Scooped by AI

Niketa Patel   Live journalism comes of age

Dheerja Kaur   Fun with subscription products

Frédéric Filloux   External forces

Cindy Royal   Your journalism curriculum is obsolete

Basile Simon   We need better career paths for news nerds

Caitria O'Neill   The new court of public opinion

Mandy Velez   texting is lit rn, fam

Matt Thompson   Here come the attention managers

Steve Grove   The midterms are an opportunity

Tanzina Vega   It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic

Bill Keller   A growing turn to philanthropy

Jacqui Cheng   Retailers move into content

Sam Ford   The year of investing in processes

Jim Moroney   Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for

Elizabeth Jensen   Show your work

Umbreen Bhatti   The trust problem isn’t new

Matt Carlson   Attacks on the press will get worse

Sara M. Watson   Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters

Federica Cherubini   The rise of bridge roles in news organizations

Feli Sánchez   The year for guerrilla user research

Kelsey Proud   No, no, no

Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy   Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism

David Skok   Finding an information-life balance

Alfred Hermida   Going beyond mobile-first

Corey Ford   The empire strikes back

Jennifer Choi   Standing up for us and for each other

Mario García   Storytelling finally adapts to mobile

Rick Berke   Value is the watchword

Tanya Cordrey   Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention

Ray Soto   VR reaches the next level

Corey Johnson   The pro-fact resistance

Debra Adams Simmons   And a woman shall lead them

Mi-Ai Parrish   Blockchain and trust

Mira Lowe   The year of the local watchdog

Vivian Schiller   Pivot to tomorrow

Julia Beizer   A longer view on the pivot

Vanessa K. DeLuca   Women’s voices take center stage

Julia B. Chan   Looking for loyalty in all the right places

Zizi Papacharissi   Women come back

Damon Krukowski   Reviving the alt-weekly soul

Amy King   Let’s amplify visual voice

Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer   Skepticism and narcissism

Joanne McNeil   Gatekeeping the gatekeepers

Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán   The editorial meeting of the future

Mariana Moura Santos   Think local, act global

Michelle Garcia   Navigating journalistic transparency

Hossein Derakhshan   Television has won

Raju Narisetti   Mirror, mirror on the wall

Kim Fox   Audience teams diversify their approach

Juliette De Maeyer   A responsible press criticism

Joyce Barnathan   It will be harder to bury the news

Kathleen McElroy   Building a news video experience native to mobile

Lam Thuy Vo   Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest

Mariano Blejman   News games rule

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Publishing less to give readers more

Rachel Davis Mersey   AI, with real smarts

Heather Bryant   Building the ecosystems for collaboration

Nikki Usher   The year of The Washington Post

Laura E. Davis   Writing answers before you know the question

S. Mitra Kalita   The arc of news and audience

Rodney Benson   Better, less read, and less trusted

Doris Truong   Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes

Mary Walter-Brown   Show a little vulnerability

Emily Goligoski   Looking beyond news for inspiration

José Zamora   Revenue-first journalism

Daniel Trielli   The rich get richer, the poor scramble

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity

Jake Levine   The return to now

Lucas Graves   From algorithms to institutions

Christopher Meighan   Passive partnership is in the rearview

Aron Pilhofer   We can’t leave the business to the business side any more

Lanre Akinola   Making noise is not a strategy

Alan Soon   The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media

Monique Judge   Letting black women tell their own stories

Ståle Grut   Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks

Rubina Madan Fillion   Unlocking the potential of AI

Andrew Ramsammy   The year ownership mattered

Nicholas Quah   Stop talking trash about young people

Juleyka Lantigua   Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time

Kawandeep Virdee   Zines had it right all along

Francesco Marconi   The year of machine-to-machine journalism

Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg   (Hint: It’s about your brand)

Alexios Mantzarlis   Moving fake news research out of the lab

Dan Newman   A return to trust

Burt Herman   Things get real

Justin Kosslyn   The year journalists become digital security experts

Miguel Castro   The arrival of the impact producer

Emma Carew Grovum   Newsroom culture becomes a priority

Pete Brown   Push alerts, personalized

Nancy Watzman   Know thy TV

Claire Wardle   Disinformation gets worse

Jim Brady   With the people, not just of the people

Tim Carmody   Watch out for Spotify

Adam Thomas   Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor

Ruth Palmer   Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities

Mike Caulfield   Refactoring media literacy for the networked age

Gordon Crovitz   Serving readers over advertisers

Kinsey Wilson   Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up

Michelle Ferrier   The year of the great reckoning

Helen Havlak   Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds

Charo Henríquez   Training is an investment, not an expense

Pia Frey   Address users as individuals

Trushar Barot   The Jio-fication of India

Almar Latour   Conquering calm

Renée Kaplan   The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)

Tamar Charney   We get serious about algorithms

Tracie Powell   The muting of underserved voices

Jamie Mottram   From pageviews to t-shirts

Sally Lehrman   Trust comes first

Caitlin Thompson   Podcasting models mature and diversify

Carlos Martínez de la Serna   The new journalism commons

Amie Ferris-Rotman   More female reporters abroad (please)

Jared Newman   Venture funding and digital news don’t mix

Taylor Lorenz   Social and media will split

Yvonne Leow   The rise of video messaging

Susie Banikarim   R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)

Alice Antheaume   Are you fluent in AI?

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms

Rachel Schallom   Better design helps differentiate opinion and news

Manoush Zomorodi   Self-help as a publishing strategy

Kristen Muller   The year of the voter

Jarrod Dicker   Honesty in advertising

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Seeking trust in fragmented spaces

P. Kim Bui   The reckoning is only beginning

Joanne Lipman   Journalists inventing revenue streams

Craig Newmark   Working together toward sustainable solutions

Mary Meehan   Real lives are at stake in rural areas

Jennifer Coogan   The future is female

AX Mina   Memes and visuals come to the fore

Nathalie Malinarich   Peak push

Errin Haines   At the ballot, it’s time to count black women

Eric Nuzum   Beyond the narrative arc

C.W. Anderson   The social media apocalypse

Jassim Ahmad   Thriving on change

Pablo Boczkowski   The rise of skeptical reading

Evie Nagy   Pivot to mobile video frustration

Hannah Cassius   The year of the echo-chamber escapists

Richard Tofel   The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention

Borja Echevarría   TV goes digital, digital goes TV