In 2015, a pharmaceutical executive named Martin Shkreli hiked AIDS drug prices by 5,000 percent. Of course the media had a field day — here was an un-ambiguously unlikeable guy being an un-ambiguous douche to AIDS patients. There was hardly a need to influence public opinion here.
The hitch? Due to all the negative exposure he received, Shkreli faced extreme difficulty finding an impartial jury this year, for unrelated charges of fraud.
From a Harper’s transcript of jury selection:
The court: “The purpose of jury selection is to ensure fairness and impartiality in this case. If you think that you could not be fair and impartial, it is your duty to tell me. All right. Juror No. 1.”
Juror No. 1: “I’m aware of the defendant and I hate him.”
Benjamin Brafman, Shkreli’s lawyer: “I’m sorry.”
Juror No. 1: “I think he’s a greedy little man.”
The court: “Jurors are obligated to decide the case based only on the evidence. Do you agree?”
Juror No. 1: “I don’t know if I could. I wouldn’t want me on this jury.”
The court: “Juror No. 1 is excused.”
“Innocent until proven guilty” is, technically, our standard.
Traditionally, a judge decides what evidence to allow and a jury of peers decide upon a verdict. Personal feelings, outside knowledge, and pressures from friends and family expressly should not factor into this verdict. Legal cases are not meant to be argued outside of the courtroom, or decided on gut and bias.
The informal court of public opinion has operated alongside our legal system for decades. The term is used to describe advocates on both sides of an issue using media to influence public opinion, and in turn, the jurors and verdict. The courts are well aware of this issue: Juries are selected carefully and sometimes cloistered during trials to try to avoid the influence of public opinion.
In 2017, we reached a vital landmark with Shkreli’s difficulty finding a jury of unbiased peers. With the rise of social media platforms and the 24-hour news cycle, we’re able to saturate public opinion.
Media storms surrounding trials are not unusual. Consider the coverage surrounding the Rodney King beating, the O.J. Simpson trial, and Trayvon Martin’s shooting. In each scenario, the media curated evidence and expert opinions, encouraging people outside of the courtroom to become a shadow jury. They elevated the importance of viewers’ individual opinions on the accused’s guilt or innocence.
Disbelief in the evidence, the judgment, or sometimes the court itself became the story.
Traditionally, trust in the courts has been strong enough for citizens to accept official judgments, even if they disagree. But over the last decade, backlash after judgments that the informed public see as “incorrect” has been increasing.
Remember the shock that followed the Zimmerman acquittal, or when the death of Casey Anthony’s adorable daughter was not avenged? The media, in both cases, extensively covered dissenting opinions from the public.
A jury is asked to hand down a verdict on very specifically worded charges, only referring to evidence that has specifically allowed. Convinced of our own opinions, it is easy forget that the jury is not being asked simply “guilty or not guilty.”
This isn’t inherently a problem. But each decision that the public is groomed to reject can fuel the decline of faith in justice through the courts.
In 2017, the court of public opinion became a diaspora, and personal opinion officially supplanted data and evidence. We’ve left the model of the traditional court, with a commonly accepted set of evidence, behind.
The new court of public opinion is a basketball court. Everyone gets their own ball (opinion). Everyone plays by the rules they consider fair.
It’s fucking madness.
In 2017, a new journalistic standard has been set. The court of public opinion may be invoked to build support for issues that cannot be decided in a court of law. Winning the war for public opinion is tantamount.
Vice, Vox, CNN and a host of other media organizations flooded the state of Alabama with reporters ahead of December’s Senate election. The overwhelming question? “Is Roy Moore a man of god or a child molester?”
I am sitting in a cafe in Los Angeles right now, listening to a group of women explain how they know certain men who have been accused of sexual harassment are guilty, and how they know other’s aren’t.
“He’s a personality. They’re always going to look for oppo research.”
“Now they’re digging into everybody. Looking for everything.”
The problem here is not that these women have formed opinions. The problem is that, increasingly, media organizations are serving as the judge, deciding which evidence to uphold or dismiss.
Worse, they’ve recruited us all as players in their jury. Suddenly, having a defensible opinion is the point. Not truth, or justice.
This is an unhealthy and unsustainable trend.
The court of public opinion is not inherently evil, and there are scenarios that should be argued in the public rather than cloistered in private arbitration. Elements of the #metoo discussion highlight the value of public deliberation. Since redress mechanisms across industries proved unable to justly resolve complaints of sexual harassment and sexual assault — the media was right to step in.
Journalists and media organizations should carefully police their interventions in public opinion for the following negative effects.
Convening the court of public opinion is both an important public service and a dangerous trend in discourse.
In the court of public opinion, media organizations play the stewards of evidence, the prosecution and the defense. As we enter 2018, it is important for these actors to understand the impact of this role upon both individual opinions, collective understanding, and resulting policy.
Caitria O’Neill is a UX designer and researcher, formerly at Facebook.
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
An Xiao Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media