In 2015, a pharmaceutical executive named Martin Shkreli hiked AIDS drug prices by 5,000 percent. Of course the media had a field day — here was an un-ambiguously unlikeable guy being an un-ambiguous douche to AIDS patients. There was hardly a need to influence public opinion here.
The hitch? Due to all the negative exposure he received, Shkreli faced extreme difficulty finding an impartial jury this year, for unrelated charges of fraud.
From a Harper’s transcript of jury selection:
The court: “The purpose of jury selection is to ensure fairness and impartiality in this case. If you think that you could not be fair and impartial, it is your duty to tell me. All right. Juror No. 1.”
Juror No. 1: “I’m aware of the defendant and I hate him.”
Benjamin Brafman, Shkreli’s lawyer: “I’m sorry.”
Juror No. 1: “I think he’s a greedy little man.”
The court: “Jurors are obligated to decide the case based only on the evidence. Do you agree?”
Juror No. 1: “I don’t know if I could. I wouldn’t want me on this jury.”
The court: “Juror No. 1 is excused.”
“Innocent until proven guilty” is, technically, our standard.
Traditionally, a judge decides what evidence to allow and a jury of peers decide upon a verdict. Personal feelings, outside knowledge, and pressures from friends and family expressly should not factor into this verdict. Legal cases are not meant to be argued outside of the courtroom, or decided on gut and bias.
The informal court of public opinion has operated alongside our legal system for decades. The term is used to describe advocates on both sides of an issue using media to influence public opinion, and in turn, the jurors and verdict. The courts are well aware of this issue: Juries are selected carefully and sometimes cloistered during trials to try to avoid the influence of public opinion.
In 2017, we reached a vital landmark with Shkreli’s difficulty finding a jury of unbiased peers. With the rise of social media platforms and the 24-hour news cycle, we’re able to saturate public opinion.
Media storms surrounding trials are not unusual. Consider the coverage surrounding the Rodney King beating, the O.J. Simpson trial, and Trayvon Martin’s shooting. In each scenario, the media curated evidence and expert opinions, encouraging people outside of the courtroom to become a shadow jury. They elevated the importance of viewers’ individual opinions on the accused’s guilt or innocence.
Disbelief in the evidence, the judgment, or sometimes the court itself became the story.
Traditionally, trust in the courts has been strong enough for citizens to accept official judgments, even if they disagree. But over the last decade, backlash after judgments that the informed public see as “incorrect” has been increasing.
Remember the shock that followed the Zimmerman acquittal, or when the death of Casey Anthony’s adorable daughter was not avenged? The media, in both cases, extensively covered dissenting opinions from the public.
A jury is asked to hand down a verdict on very specifically worded charges, only referring to evidence that has specifically allowed. Convinced of our own opinions, it is easy forget that the jury is not being asked simply “guilty or not guilty.”
This isn’t inherently a problem. But each decision that the public is groomed to reject can fuel the decline of faith in justice through the courts.
In 2017, the court of public opinion became a diaspora, and personal opinion officially supplanted data and evidence. We’ve left the model of the traditional court, with a commonly accepted set of evidence, behind.
The new court of public opinion is a basketball court. Everyone gets their own ball (opinion). Everyone plays by the rules they consider fair.
It’s fucking madness.
In 2017, a new journalistic standard has been set. The court of public opinion may be invoked to build support for issues that cannot be decided in a court of law. Winning the war for public opinion is tantamount.
Vice, Vox, CNN and a host of other media organizations flooded the state of Alabama with reporters ahead of December’s Senate election. The overwhelming question? “Is Roy Moore a man of god or a child molester?”
I am sitting in a cafe in Los Angeles right now, listening to a group of women explain how they know certain men who have been accused of sexual harassment are guilty, and how they know other’s aren’t.
“He’s a personality. They’re always going to look for oppo research.”
“Now they’re digging into everybody. Looking for everything.”
The problem here is not that these women have formed opinions. The problem is that, increasingly, media organizations are serving as the judge, deciding which evidence to uphold or dismiss.
Worse, they’ve recruited us all as players in their jury. Suddenly, having a defensible opinion is the point. Not truth, or justice.
This is an unhealthy and unsustainable trend.
The court of public opinion is not inherently evil, and there are scenarios that should be argued in the public rather than cloistered in private arbitration. Elements of the #metoo discussion highlight the value of public deliberation. Since redress mechanisms across industries proved unable to justly resolve complaints of sexual harassment and sexual assault — the media was right to step in.
Journalists and media organizations should carefully police their interventions in public opinion for the following negative effects.
Convening the court of public opinion is both an important public service and a dangerous trend in discourse.
In the court of public opinion, media organizations play the stewards of evidence, the prosecution and the defense. As we enter 2018, it is important for these actors to understand the impact of this role upon both individual opinions, collective understanding, and resulting policy.
Caitria O’Neill is a UX designer and researcher, formerly at Facebook.
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Mariano Blejman News games rule
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
An Xiao Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for