I fear 2018 will be the year we will see a major platform decide that news is simply not worth the trouble and move to (1) reduce the role of news and systematically separate it from other content and (2) reduce the number of news organizations allowed to publish to the platform, strictly controlling who has the opportunity.
We can call this the “Snapchat scenario,” as that is basically how news works on Snapchat. Some platforms in mainland China, Japan, and South Korea also control news distribution tightly and are only open to preapproved select partners.
Relatively open platforms like Facebook or YouTube could choose to adopt this model, for any mix of three possible reasons rooted in politics, users, or advertising—
For those who see the relationship between platforms and publishers as a zero-sum game, having a platform like Facebook or YouTube stepping away from news might seem like a win.
It would almost certainly be a win for the “platform darlings” who would be allowed to continue to publish to the platform. (Past experience suggests these select partners would be (a) few, (b) primarily English-language brands with international reach, and (c) mostly but not exclusively up-market.)
But what would it be like for the literally tens of thousands of publishers all over the world who are not “platform darlings” and do not have the scale or exclusivity to be attractive partners? The large drops in referrals to publishers when Facebook experimented with a Snapchat-like separation between private posts from individuals and public posts from pages in a number of countries in the fall of 2017 suggest not.
The reason the Snapchat scenario worries me is that — while it is clear that major platforms like Facebook and YouTube have been misused to spread disinformation, misinformation, and hate speech, both by for-profit actors and political actors, and have to confront serious issues concerning the quality, intelligibility, and algorithmic filtering of content — they also have some very real positive implications that might well be imperiled if news content was much more restricted. They include:
It is clear that large platforms like Facebook and YouTube have system-wide implications in terms of their dominant role in drawing attention, collecting data, and attracting advertising, and that, by enabling lots of different actors and activities, they have also become platforms for many troubling things and have sometimes failed to check these.
But these relatively permissive and often rambunctious environments also have demonstrably positive implications for our democracies. It is not inherently wrong that Snapchat and some other platforms take a far more restrictive approach to news. But do we want the biggest platforms to do the same?
Most platforms would want to continue to let their users “organically” share things they are interested in. But the example of Snapchat — and many increasingly popular messaging apps — suggest they can simultaneously decide to design their products in ways that limit both the role of news overall and news organizations’ ability to freely publish to the platform.
This is the Snapchat-scenario future we may face, but in my view not one we should aspire to. A central challenge going forward is how the positive effects outlined can be retained while also confronting some of the very real problems associated with the rise of platforms. How do we, as societies, deal with this? Paraphrasing James Madison’s stance on the rambunctious and often wildly inaccurate and partisan press of the early American republic, we might say that some degree of abuse is inseparable from the proper use of everything, and in no instance is this more true than in that of open platforms. I hope efforts to combat such abuse won’t involve systematically reducing and restricting the role of news.
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen is director of research at the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at Oxford University.
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
An Xiao Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin