Machines, not humans, will become the biggest consumers of news in 2018. This shift will be driven by the growing impact of smart devices and the internet of things in the information ecosystem.
When two machines speak to each other, they speak in a language of categorization — a taxonomy. Words are organized into categories, which then trigger an output. In machine-to-machine journalism, this output (a story or other piece of news content) from one machine is then interpreted by a second machine before it reaches its final audience.
For example, one machine can create stories out of data, send that story to a second machine, which then personalizes that story and only then disseminates it to a human. But machine-to-machine journalism can also achieve tangible outcomes beyond informing individual news consumers. For example, an automated financial story about stocks can change another machine’s investment patterns, or an AI lawyer can assess how libelous an automated article can be across different jurisdictions.
Journalists will need to examine how these machines speak to each other and how they develop connection with one another — perhaps even emotional ones.
But replicating human judgment in language is not an inevitable technological advance. Machine-to-machine journalism will be confronted with the challenge of replicating a kind of “journalistic intuition” merely through data points. This is particularly difficult, because humans have a very complex and adaptive way of assessing value judgments in one another’s speech. In other words, when two people speak, each has an intrinsic barometer that assesses the relative value of the words the other party is using against a standard that you perceive him or her to have. For example, when someone who tends to exaggerate describes something as “revolutionary,” the word has a different relative value than when somebody uses it who is rarely impressed. And as relationships develop, humans gain an increasingly nuanced understanding into one another’s speech value judgments. It remains a question whether a journalistic intuition can be developed using existing data points as an input.
The proliferation of smart devices in 2018 will quickly generate demand for “smart content” — news tailored to a specific individual or use case, and personalized with a specific editorial style. And the way that two or more smart machines can speak to one another through stories presents new opportunities and challenges — it can generate higher engagement but could also lead to information asymmetries.
Today, most people find information via search or social, and while these two channels are radically different in functionality, they have one thing in common — any given article surfaced through these platforms is exactly the same for everyone in the world.
For example, an article entitled “Legionnaires’ disease outbreak looms over southern California” reads the same to me, a 31-year-old male living in New York City, and for a mother of two in her early 40’s residing in San Diego.
Content today is one-size-fits-all. And why wouldn’t it be? A journalist writes a story hoping to reach as many people as possible.
Search and social helped tailor information choices to individuals to a degree by leveraging content recommendation technology. But what happens when the content itself can be created, processed, and distributed through algorithms (the smart machines) that analyze readers’ locations, social media posts and other publicly available data? News consumers could then be served content through a smart device, tailored to their personality, mood, and socioeconomic status, among other things — infinite versions of the same story. True personalization drives higher consumption, but without editorial guidelines and well defined journalistic standards, could also create siloed views of the same reality.
When machine-to-machine journalism becomes a prevalent way to produce, process, and distribute content, then those algorithms will start falling under the purview of journalists. Just as it’s important to verify a source’s reliability, it will become crucial to consider the reliability of smart machines.
Francesco Marconi is strategy manager and AI co-lead at The Associated Press.
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
An Xiao Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest