2018 will be the year of personalized push alerts.
The average lock screen is full of push alerts. They don’t just come from news apps, but Instagram, Uber, Snapchat, Seamless, your bank.
News outlets have sensed a higher tolerance for push alerts and have become much bolder in this area. Many have branched out beyond breaking news — which is competitive to the point that it’s almost impossible to stand out from the crowd — to push analysis, major enterprise pieces, investigations, in-depth features, and other content deemed valuable to their audience.
It isn’t hard to see why. Unmediated by third-parties like Facebook and Google, push alerts provide news outlets with one of the most direct, most intimate connections to their audiences. They provide a vital, and highly valued, opportunity to build and maintain brand loyalty.
But no news audience is monolithic.
The less generous assessment of push alerts is that they are intrusive. They are an interruption to someone’s day and tolerance for those interruptions differ from one person to the next. While some people welcome a steady stream of alerts from their favorite news brand, others don’t.
Some get annoyed if they feel they’re getting too many alerts. Some assume that opting in to alerts means opting in to breaking news and nothing else. Some are adamant that sports events aren’t worthy of an alert. Some really don’t like receiving alerts that aren’t about news.
One solution to this is personalization.
Many of the smartest people working with push — Greg Emerson at The Wall Street Journal, Eric Bishop at The New York Times, Sasha Koren from the Guardian U.S. Mobile Innovation Lab, to name just three — stress the importance of putting the audience first. Giving them the power to control what they want, how they want it, when they want it. Personalized push alerts are a vital way of achieving that on mobile.
Of course, personalized push alerts isn’t a new concept by any means. Some outlets are doing it and doing it well. But it is an area that is woefully under-utilized. Over half of the 31 apps included in my recent study of push alerts offered just one, all-or-nothing alert option, usually characterized as breaking news.
This includes some major players, such as The Washington Post, Bloomberg, and Fox News. Alerts from the BBC Worldwide app can only be turned on or off in the phone’s system settings.
Above (L-R): All-or-nothing alert options in the Bloomberg, Fox News and BBC Worldwide iOS apps.
A mobile editor based at a major, global outlet whose app alerts don’t offer any degree of customization told me that personalization was, “something we desperately want and are begging our product counterparts to build.”
News outlets working within these confines face real challenges. They are forced to either (a) limit themselves to major breaking news, missing a vital opportunity to develop stronger ties with users that would like more alerts, or (b) push a wider variety of content via their one, catch-all channel, risking the wrath of users who thought they were only signing up for breaking news alerts.
Both options are undesirable. The former will force some audiences to look elsewhere. The latter will cause intense irritation to some audience members, damaging their perception of the brand and possibly leading them to disable alerts or remove the app entirely.
Personalized push alerts benefit both the audience and the news outlet. On the audience side, they solve a problem for users at every end of the spectrum. Those that think they get too many alerts, or only want to hear about big breaking news events, can alter their settings to cover the bare minimum. The news hounds that want to know everything can opt it to as many as they desire. News outlets benefit because they get to put their best content (and sometimes that’s just a really well-crafted alert) in front of the audience that most wants it.
When audiences opt in to specific, non-breaking channels, it’s a clear signal that they are hungry for alerts about that topic. This provides scope to be more aggressive, more expansive, and more creative, providing a valuable opportunity to cement a tight relationship with some of their loyal and engaged users.
The really smart outlets will build an element of nuance into their customization options. Take Bleacher Report’s (excellent) alerts, for example. Their bread and butter is to provide sports news and scores (sometimes containing video of the action) for your favorites sports teams. But they built in an additional switch that allows their users to avoid spoilers — a lovely option for those days when you’ve DVR-ed the game and want to watch it unspoiled, as-live, at a later date. Quartz has something similar with its option to filter out alerts about Donald Trump.
None of this is easy. Deciding how to personalize, and what categories to include, is not a straightforward task. Building the product and on-boarding users is challenging, too. The absence of a feedback mechanism makes it hard to pinpoint exactly what audiences want. But it’s important not to ask too much of them. It’s questionable whether anyone wants to sift through 50-100 personalization options, for example.
Above (L-R): Customization options in the CNN MoneyStream and Dallas Morning News iOS apps.
The lack of high quality data doesn’t help, and what data there is often doesn’t capture what newsrooms really want to know: whether their audience values and appreciates the alert. The lack of a tap doesn’t necessarily translate to a lack of appreciation.
Personalization is not straightforward. But it’s absolutely worth it — and news outlets know it. Those that do it well will reap the rewards.
Pete Brown is a senior research fellow at the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia.
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
AX Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more