It was Ray Bradbury that said predicting the future was easy. You just look around and predict more of the same. But he wasn’t having it.
“To hell with more,” he wrote, “I want better.”
In the area of digital media literacy education, the “more” prediction is easy. There will be more of it. States, provinces, and countries will begin to roll out larger programs. People will be hired. Initiatives will be funded. Consultants will be engaged and new programs designed. Edtech startups, lurching out of recent personalized education failures, will sense money to be extracted from the public purse and pitch last year’s wares with a brand new pivot. 2016’s coding microcredential platform will become 2018’s information literacy solution.
There will be 32 headlines that claim a newly funded company has “solved the information literacy problem,” all dutifully transcribed from the latest Y Combinator press releases. They will use the term “fake news.” The irony of this will be lost on both startup and tech press transcriber.
So that’s the more. But what about the better?
Lost initially in the mad rush to monetize the most recent crisis will be the fact that underneath the new coat of paint many of these solutions are decades old. That’s fine, of course, if it turns out these solutions help folks make sense of the web. Maybe the failure of them is due just to underuse. It could be.
Me, I’m skeptical. I’ve been involved in online literacy for a decade and I’m not convinced “more” does it. Recent studies seem to support this conclusion, finding that an awful lot of highly educated folks, skilled in all sorts of traditional media literacy, are hopelessly lost on the web. (Many of these people are faculty).
Given this, 2018 could be the year that we refactor media literacy, bringing the insights of people with teaching experience together with experts on the current information environment and people (such as fact-checkers) that most closely model target competencies. This project would start by asking what a citizen needs to be able to do online, and what skills, understandings, and dispositions they need to do it. It’d work backwards from there, tapping into the insights of the newly thriving interdisciplinary field of misinformation. It’d make something new, and suited to the purpose in front of us.
Far-fetched? Maybe. But media literacy has always been crisis-driven, and has undergone major revisions to address perceived threats before. The interdisciplinary collaboration that we see the misinformation field currently engaging in is inspiring, and provides a possible model. This could be the year.
Don’t bet on that of course. Always, always, bet on more. But put your heart and soul into achieving better.
One other prediction, on the rise of the right to be informed.
In our mental model of tyranny, Orwell’s 1984 has an outsized influence. The government chirps its preferred narrative repeatedly at the people, monitors their acceptance of it, maintains the only historical record, and bends history and perception to its centralized will. Orwell’s “boot stamping on a face — forever” is always government-issue footwear, the make and shoe size clearly visible.
In Orwell’s world, and indeed in the world of many past totalitarian regimes, the right to speak and the right to be informed — the ability to hear views outside of what the government provided — were inextricably intertwined. The government had monopoly power over narrative, which it both exercised (keeping the population uninformed) and protected (preventing expression of divergent views). Our society, always set up to fight the last war, has tended to see these rights as intertwined.
This model, however, is outdated. Modern totalitarian regimes do not exercise monopoly control over narrative. Rather, they use a variety of technological and organic means to make competing narratives inaccessible to or untrusted by the public. They leverage the use of “patriotic trolling,” as seen in the Philippines, and armies of paid commenters and fake profiles leveraging real participation. In the U.S., the hordes of bots and people who talk like bots invade competing hashtags and disrupt political communication. Weaponized transparency, defended by free speech advocates, is used to overwhelm the public’s capacity to separate fact from fiction, as we saw with the Podesta email “leaks.” Speech — whether automated or organized — is being used strategically to prevent access to information the public needs to govern itself.
In such a world, we will start to see people, out of necessity, peel apart the right to free speech from the right to be informed. The right to be informed will need to take into account, as Zeynep Tufekci has argued, the limits of attention and the way bad information can be used to crowd out good. It will take into account the deleterious effects of information overload, and wrestle with the impact of systemic harassment in wiping out minority voices. This evolved conception of free speech as a right to expression that sometimes conflicts with a parallel right to be informed will begin to form a legal, technical, and educational framework which is better able to defend against the tyranny face instead of the tyranny we remember.
Mike Caulfield heads the Digital Polarization Initiative at the American Democracy Project.
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
An Xiao Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy