Here’s an easy prediction: 2018 will bring mounting pressure to develop large-scale, automated responses to online misinformation. And here’s a hopeful one: That pressure will spark an increasingly frank discussion among journalists, policymakers, and platform companies about how to bolster the fact-building institutions that anchor public truth claims.
The quest to automate online fact-checking began well before the furor over so-called “fake news.” Fact-checks have a consistent structure built around discrete data elements — a claim, a claimant, a verdict — that lends itself to marrying human and machine intelligence in interesting ways. One of the first attempts to do this was Truth Goggles, an MIT project that (as initially conceived in 2011) tried to harness the work of professional fact-checkers to build a “magical button” that would instantly flag false claims on any web page.
Since then, fact-checkers and computer scientists have worked together on a string of projects that aim to automate different part of the fact-checking process. One thing these efforts have in common is using automation as an enhancement, rather than a replacement, for journalistic work — as what Bill Adair, writing in these pages past year, called a “force multiplier” to help human fact-checkers keep up with a growing tide of online misinformation.
For example, the most tedious part of a fact-checker’s job is hunting for interesting and important claims to check; a lot of what politicians say in speeches and debates turns out to be vague rhetoric or statements of opinion. ClaimBuster, developed by computer scientists at the University of Texas at Arlington, pores over transcripts to identify and rank factual statements that fact-checkers might want to investigate. (It also retweets checkable claims here.)
Another promising tool, being developed by the U.K.-based Full Fact, scans media feeds to track which politicians and news outlets are repeating claims that have already been debunked. Called Trends, the project is designed to give the fact-checkers a strategic view of the misinformation landscape, so they can target their corrections more effectively. Political journalists will also be able to use it to guide their reporting.
The most powerful automation technology deployed so far is in some ways the simplest: Since 2016, growing numbers of fact-checkers around the world have been using a new tagging scheme, called ClaimReview, that makes their work legible to algorithms. This means that when Google recognizes the claim being searched for — try “the Russia investigation is a made-up story” — it can preview the verdict in a “snippet” at the top of the search results. (The same tagging system lets the Amazon Echo look up answers to factual queries.)
The research involved in efforts like these has started to bring into view the “holy grail” of an end-to-end fact-checking engine that can check at least some kinds of claims in real time. ClaimBuster and Full Fact have trials in the works (see videos here and here) which operate by matching new claims against fact-checkers’ databases — or, in certain cases, by consulting original data sources such as economic statistics or voting records. As Full Fact noted in a 2016 report, the key to these efforts “is to make sure the kinds of resources fact-checkers can rely on are available as structured data that computers can use.”
And that’s what’s most exciting about these initiatives: Designing the systems to automate verification will draw focus back to the public, institutionally sanctioned data sources that human fact-checkers depend on to certify facts about everything from hurricane strength to inflation rates. These include agencies at every level of government — the U.K.’s Office of National Statistics is an ideal-typical example — as well as countless scientific and civil institutions that set standards and produce benchmark data in different areas of research or policy.
Political fact-checkers couldn’t do what they do without these kinds of institutional resources. Of course, neither could Google’s search algorithms, which depend both directly and indirectly on institutional authority reflected in our patterns of clicking and linking online. In fact, professional fact-checking groups act as a kind of social engine — one of many — for translating institutional knowledge into data that computers can work with.
Reflections on the rise of “algorithmic authority” have tended to oppose it to the institutional kind, based on old-world mechanisms like formal credentialing and peer review. The push for “automated” fact-checking may help us to come to terms with a reality that has always been messier than that, making explicit the institutional subsidy that algorithmic intelligence depends on.
Lucas Graves is senior research fellow at the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin.
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
An Xiao Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency