There is a quiet revolution in the making. It’s about how people make sense of the news. Barely perceptible amidst the loudness of commentary about bots, trolls, fake news, echo chambers, filter bubbles, confirmation bias, artificial intelligence, and so on is the realization that readers, listeners, viewers, and users are becoming ever more skeptical about the information they encounter in the news and social media. And that’s a good thing. Skepticism is a necessary, albeit not sufficient, condition for the emergence of sustainable solutions regarding a potential state of misinformation marking contemporary politics and culture.
As far as media and journalism go, 2017 has been a transition year. Practitioners, analysts, and scholars have grappled with a collective sense that a fundamental dislocation has emerged in how the news are reported and distributed. While there is some consensus about a massive shift, there is much less certainty about what it exactly consists of, its causes, and its consequences. The initial cultural reflex has been a narrative about technological disruption of old conventions that have long governed the production and circulation of news, thus ushering a new regime of misinformation.
Often lost in this dystopian narrative is an account of how people make sense of an increasingly digitally created and curated new world of news. This, in turn, has led to an implicit overestimation of the power of technology and a parallel underestimation of the interpretive agency of news consumers. It would appear that readers of twenty-first century news can be more easily manipulated than those of the previous century. But are they? I suspect not. If anything, it might be the opposite.
For the past twelve months, my collaborators and I have been conducting in-depth interviews with a broad sample of consumers of news, entertainment, and technology. Among other things, we have asked them about issues such as fake news and trust in the information they see on the social media platforms they use and news media they consume on a regular basis. An account published previously on this site showed the existence of four mechanisms guiding people’s reading practices: strategic curation, mindful processing, emotional interpretation, and subjective attachment. What has emerged in conjunction with the combination of these mechanisms is a heightened degree of skepticism.
There is skepticism about the news media. For instance, one of the interviewees said that she is “concerned about the news programming. I think when I was younger I trusted it implicitly, which probably was not a good idea when I look back. But some of my trust and faith in the news and the news community is not what it was. I’m not trusting. I’m wondering what they’re leaving off.” Similar idea recurred in multiple interviews. “I think there has been a shift in the news and I feel like the news is not, no matter what you listen to, it’s not completely giving you both sides. It either gives you one way of looking at it and doesn’t really make you a critical thinker. I think that before, maybe you were getting news that was more critical thinking and you had to analyze if it’s correct or not correct…There is definitely been a shift in the news.”
There is also skepticism about the information that people see on social media. One person commented that on Facebook “it’s hard to decipher what’s real and what’s not. So, like, if I have just seen an article on Facebook, then I might go to the Internet and try to find that same headline. But I wouldn’t necessarily say that I would read it on Facebook.” Another interviewee added, “I’m very familiar with my friends’ posting habits and ignore three quarters of what’s on there because of that.”
How do people deal with this increased level of skepticism?
They are more mindful of the provenance and treatment of information. One of interviewees commented that she “started to pay attention to where the news is from because of fake news.” Others singled out specific sources. For instance, one commented “CNN used to have a fairly good reputation but they, too, report rumors without really confirming things and then they go back, maybe in the middle of a program, and retract what they said.” Similar patterns apply to social media: “I usually check things now that catch my eye so if I think it’s too dramatic to be true, I’ll look into it.”
They also check multiple sources. For instance, “I tend to look to see if the different political—just taking it from that point of view, then the different political view—or messaging sources converge, they both say, both agree on the same basic facts about something.” Finally, they use search engines to do their own fact-checking. “I don’t share news articles very often but if I do I probably try to read three or four articles on the topic. I’ve taking to generally Googling things just to try to get a concept of it.”
Taken together, these responses, combined with the overall skeptical stance, are the kernel of an ongoing revolution in interpretive practices. It is more quiet transformation than that of how technology has affected the production and distribution of information. But it is no less fundamental and likely more sustainable, since it has been shaping the cultural foundations of sensemaking. As such, it will be a key source of collective antibodies against the perils of misinformation.
By emerging organically from within the social fabric, these interpretive antibodies will be more durable than any technical fixes, and also a necessary complement to their possible efficacy. Unlike technology, culture changes slowly. But when it does, the consequences of these changes stay for a long time. So here’s to a 2018 full of skeptical readings of the news!
Pablo J. Boczkowski is a professor in the School of Communication at Northwestern University.
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
AX Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy