Newsrooms are up against a life-or-death mix of maladies: public distrust, dialogue breakdown, platform disruption, disinformation and the fact that everyone is getting completely different information. We’re all looking for a cure. But what if the symptoms of all these ills can trace their root causes to inside of our own house? On other words: what if it’s not “them” to blame, it’s us?
So much of this dysfunction starts in the way we run our editorial meetings. So as a starting point, let’s imagine how fixing those critically important meetings can also fix our other underlying illnesses.
In today’s editorial meeting, we organize everything around the content production line: the so-called “beasts to feed.” The unit we produce is the story and we focus everything around how to make enough of them fill all of the containers and platforms — online, on-air, on social, on mobile, on watches, and on and on.
In the future, we’ll instead organize the editorial meeting around this all-important question: “What can we help the public understand or do today?” We won’t start with our ideas — we’ll start with the information gaps the public demonstrates they have, and focus our efforts squarely on filling those gaps.
These days when we’re out of personal ideas for stories, we get our inspiration by obsessing over what the competitor across town is reporting, or from whatever’s picking up steam on the Internet, or from the PR professionals and officials whose very job it is to get us to pay attention to them
In the future, what we cover will be shaped directly by our communities. It will be part of our routine to ask the public directly: “what don’t you know about ______ that you’d like us to investigate?” And we’ll come to learn that the public does not ask for pet videos or personal grudge stories when invited to shape coverage. We’ll recognize them as insightful, curious people whose questions result in original, smart, top-performing stories, that end up breaking news and winning prestigious awards.
Currently, we decide what gets covered by assuming that because we’re professionals we know exactly what to report (good old “editorial judgment”). Never mind the fact that data shows journalists are overwhelmingly one gender, one race, one class and have little in common with many of the people we cover and are aiming to serve.
In the future, we’ll be in constant conversation with the public to learn what information they need. We’ll invite them to send in questions about breaking news, we’ll visit the spaces where communities gather and just observe and listen (even without a notebook!), and convene our own events where they can discover their neighbors and discuss what’s going on and what they’d like to know more about. It will be natural for reporters to pitch stories knowing the name and face of the person who brought this curiosity to light.
Nowadays we report at all hours for months on end, keeping our progress hidden so nobody steals our amazing ideas. This is just how we work, and also how we drive ourselves to burnout. But do we have to?
In the editorial meeting of the future, we’ll ask “who outside of the newsroom can help us with the story?” before we even start reporting. When Vermont Public Radio wanted to tackle the issue of falling-down barns across Vermont, they invited their audience to share photos (and addresses!) of barns that were in rough shape. When the Australian Broadcasting Company’s Canberra bureau was investigating which federal politicians own an investment property, members of its audience joined the reporters for a fact-finding workshop to dig through documents. ProPublica also does a consistent, excellent job of involving its audience in the reporting process for many important investigations.
Journalists have their go-to experts — people they’ve built relationships with over decades, and yes, they’re smart! But it turns out that many of those cultivated folks are white men. Which means we’re missing every other perspective.
In the future, we’ll start with those living and feeling the concerns and anxieties our reporting addresses. Like how The Texas Tribune delivered information after Hurricane Harvey to those looking for aid. And WBEZ brought together Muslim communities to talk about racial divides within their mosques. The story even ended up spawning a community event designed by the interviewees after the reporting.
But how do we know our grueling, often thankless work is actually working? These days we measure by what gets the most clicks, time on site, awards, or scoops our competitors. Our business models still demand it, and so apparently do our egos.
But in the future, we’ll track our progress against this measure: “Did the people we serve accomplish their goals?” (thanks Jeff Jarvis!). And we’ll learn the answers to that by creating more paths to get direct, actionable public feedback to understand if, and how well, we’re hitting the mark.
We’ll start to walk back the obsession with quantitative performance measurements of our work and balance it with better qualitative feedback.
These days we analyze the audience way more than we analyze ourselves.
But in the future we’ll have the technology, ability and motivation to track who in our own editorial meetings speaks the most, gets their ideas approved the most often. We’ll look to the data to make sure we’re not favoring the usual suspects and that we’re giving others a fair shot at representation.
And we’ll also track whether or not the meta story our organizations is telling is accurate. If women make up more than half of the population, but analysis shows our stories feature men’s voices 63 percent of the time, we’ll recognize that we’re actually distorting reality, not reflecting it. Same goes for if the majority of stories we hear about one demographic or neighborhood is predominantly negative. With the help of data analysis applied to ourselves, we’ll become aware of how our power dynamics play out, and how we contribute to stoking fear and warping the public’s sense of the world.
Our success will depend on becoming essential to those we aim to serve. We’ll know it if the public feels invested in our work by contributing their insights, questions and ideas. We’ll know it if they respond when we ask them to subscribe or donate to keep us going.
And we’ll know if we’re headed in the right direction by measuring how well we responded to the public. Did we show respect and appreciation for their contributions, did we answer their questions, did we show up when and where they needed us?
The bad news in all of this: changing our editorial meetings will be hard, because changing habits and culture is hard. The good news is that we, not the platforms, not the Macedonian fake news factories, not public officials, not advertisers, actually have the power and authority to do it.
So will this prediction for a new editorial framework ever come to pass, and if so, when? You tell me.
Jennifer Brandel is CEO of Hearken. Mónica Guzmán is cofounder and editor of The Evergrey.
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
An Xiao Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest