So many of the challenges we face in the world stem from a simple truth: Technological innovation is moving faster than our ability to grapple with its effects on society. That’s as true in the field of journalism as it is for any industry. While misinformation, propaganda, and fake news have been problems for a very long time, the Internet has accelerated these phenomenon by putting publishing tools in everyone’s hands and allowing for viral distribution and laser-like targeting. The very same advancements that allow for free expression of all kinds are also being used by those with bad intentions to sow doubt into the quality of information online.
If it took the events of the 2016 presidential election to expose these challenges to a global audience, then what will happen in the 2018 U.S. midterm elections next year?
I think the 2018 U.S. midterms will be a galvanizing moment to apply new strategies to fight modern misinformation campaigns. The stakes are high — not only for candidates, companies, and news organizations, but for democracy as a whole. If this was the year in which it felt like the world was reeling from the challenges posed by the misinformation ecosystem, then 2018 will be the year it feels like we’re making progress.
Part of the reason I’m optimistic is that there are many different groups who are incentivized to fight for quality journalism and against misinformation. The three most important are tech platforms, news organizations, and news consumers. Each of these groups needs to be active in the fight against misinformation in order for progress to be made.
Let’s start with tech platforms. Companies like Google are doing more to create transparency around political advertising spend on our platforms. It’s an area in which we’re far from perfect and know there’s a lot more to do in 2018. We’re also launching a number of product features to prevent the spread of misinformation through our products — with more to come.
But our algorithms can’t (and shouldn’t) be the editors of the Internet. That’s why companies like Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Bing are behind initiatives like the Trust Project, a group of 75 news organizations that are producing indicators that newsrooms can add to their content to help readers better separate fact from fiction. Eight indicators have already been released, and our engineers are working to figure out how to best display these indicators next to articles that appear in Google News and Google Search. Groups like the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and Schema.org are also helping tech companies incorporate signals to identify quality journalism. And product features like our fact-check tag, designed to highlight fact-checking of newsworthy claims, are benefiting from partnerships with groups like the International Fact Checking Network to support and grow the network of fact-checkers in the world with technology and training.
We’ll see more and more initiatives like this in 2018 as platforms work to help users separate fact and fiction online — without impinging on the free expression that makes the Internet such a revolutionary platform for sharing information.
Second, news organizations are going to do more to fight fake news around the election than ever before — not just through great journalism, but through great partnerships. As we’ve seen this year in innovative collaborative reporting projects in the UK, French, and German elections, news organizations are more willing than ever to work together to fight misinformation. As the Electionland coalition heats up again, and other partnerships form around misinformation in the midterms, we’ll see a similar focus on this space in 2018.
This election cycle, news organizations will be armed with powerful new research from industry-leading groups like the First Draft coalition (of which Google News Lab is a founding partner), which has produced practical playbooks for newsrooms, and Data and Society who are doing innovative research on media manipulation by online activists. Studies like these will give journalists new insights around misinformation during election cycles that will be critical to their work.
Lastly, but perhaps most importantly, news consumers are going to play a central role in combating the misinformation ecosystem around the 2018 midterms. “News literacy” may have once referred to the basic skills you need to navigate your way around a newspaper, but today it means something much different given the size and scope of our information ecosystem (in fact, maybe the better term is information literacy). At Google, part of our user-centered product development approach is to ensure people know what they’re clicking on and reading. We’ve done this for a number of years with labels in Google News, and this year we integrated publisher information into our knowledge panels so that people understand the expertise and history of a publisher they’re searching for.
But clearly readers need more to help navigate the web. Research out of Stanford suggests that news consumers —
even young, tech-savvy students — struggle mightily to parse facts from fakes online. We’ve launched a regional information literacy project in Canada, and are asking ourselves what a global information literacy campaign might look like. What better time for such a campaign than around the 2018 midterms? Expect to hear more from us on this early next year.
Elections have always been a great forcing function to develop innovative approaches to journalism, and the 2018 U.S. midterms will be no different. The problems posed by the misinformation ecosystem are here to stay, and there are no quick fixes. But 2018 will be a step forward in the efforts of tech companies, news organizations, and news consumers to make progress in this space. There are more innovative people and institutions working on this challenge than ever before, and the opportunity we have to partner together gives me optimism for the future.
Steve Grove is director of the Google News Lab and an International Security Fellow at New America.
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
An Xiao Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for