So many of the challenges we face in the world stem from a simple truth: Technological innovation is moving faster than our ability to grapple with its effects on society. That’s as true in the field of journalism as it is for any industry. While misinformation, propaganda, and fake news have been problems for a very long time, the Internet has accelerated these phenomenon by putting publishing tools in everyone’s hands and allowing for viral distribution and laser-like targeting. The very same advancements that allow for free expression of all kinds are also being used by those with bad intentions to sow doubt into the quality of information online.
If it took the events of the 2016 presidential election to expose these challenges to a global audience, then what will happen in the 2018 U.S. midterm elections next year?
I think the 2018 U.S. midterms will be a galvanizing moment to apply new strategies to fight modern misinformation campaigns. The stakes are high — not only for candidates, companies, and news organizations, but for democracy as a whole. If this was the year in which it felt like the world was reeling from the challenges posed by the misinformation ecosystem, then 2018 will be the year it feels like we’re making progress.
Part of the reason I’m optimistic is that there are many different groups who are incentivized to fight for quality journalism and against misinformation. The three most important are tech platforms, news organizations, and news consumers. Each of these groups needs to be active in the fight against misinformation in order for progress to be made.
Let’s start with tech platforms. Companies like Google are doing more to create transparency around political advertising spend on our platforms. It’s an area in which we’re far from perfect and know there’s a lot more to do in 2018. We’re also launching a number of product features to prevent the spread of misinformation through our products — with more to come.
But our algorithms can’t (and shouldn’t) be the editors of the Internet. That’s why companies like Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Bing are behind initiatives like the Trust Project, a group of 75 news organizations that are producing indicators that newsrooms can add to their content to help readers better separate fact from fiction. Eight indicators have already been released, and our engineers are working to figure out how to best display these indicators next to articles that appear in Google News and Google Search. Groups like the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and Schema.org are also helping tech companies incorporate signals to identify quality journalism. And product features like our fact-check tag, designed to highlight fact-checking of newsworthy claims, are benefiting from partnerships with groups like the International Fact Checking Network to support and grow the network of fact-checkers in the world with technology and training.
We’ll see more and more initiatives like this in 2018 as platforms work to help users separate fact and fiction online — without impinging on the free expression that makes the Internet such a revolutionary platform for sharing information.
Second, news organizations are going to do more to fight fake news around the election than ever before — not just through great journalism, but through great partnerships. As we’ve seen this year in innovative collaborative reporting projects in the UK, French, and German elections, news organizations are more willing than ever to work together to fight misinformation. As the Electionland coalition heats up again, and other partnerships form around misinformation in the midterms, we’ll see a similar focus on this space in 2018.
This election cycle, news organizations will be armed with powerful new research from industry-leading groups like the First Draft coalition (of which Google News Lab is a founding partner), which has produced practical playbooks for newsrooms, and Data and Society who are doing innovative research on media manipulation by online activists. Studies like these will give journalists new insights around misinformation during election cycles that will be critical to their work.
Lastly, but perhaps most importantly, news consumers are going to play a central role in combating the misinformation ecosystem around the 2018 midterms. “News literacy” may have once referred to the basic skills you need to navigate your way around a newspaper, but today it means something much different given the size and scope of our information ecosystem (in fact, maybe the better term is information literacy). At Google, part of our user-centered product development approach is to ensure people know what they’re clicking on and reading. We’ve done this for a number of years with labels in Google News, and this year we integrated publisher information into our knowledge panels so that people understand the expertise and history of a publisher they’re searching for.
But clearly readers need more to help navigate the web. Research out of Stanford suggests that news consumers —
even young, tech-savvy students — struggle mightily to parse facts from fakes online. We’ve launched a regional information literacy project in Canada, and are asking ourselves what a global information literacy campaign might look like. What better time for such a campaign than around the 2018 midterms? Expect to hear more from us on this early next year.
Elections have always been a great forcing function to develop innovative approaches to journalism, and the 2018 U.S. midterms will be no different. The problems posed by the misinformation ecosystem are here to stay, and there are no quick fixes. But 2018 will be a step forward in the efforts of tech companies, news organizations, and news consumers to make progress in this space. There are more innovative people and institutions working on this challenge than ever before, and the opportunity we have to partner together gives me optimism for the future.
Steve Grove is director of the Google News Lab and an International Security Fellow at New America.
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
AX Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders