Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin

“The web of undisclosed conflicts in the bitcoin world is almost impossible to disentangle, especially since one of the celebrated features of cryptocurrencies is that they can be held secretly.”

2018 will be the year of inadequate bitcoin disclosures.

In April 2013, Farhad Manjoo (then at Slate, now at The New York Times) bought 7.23883 bitcoins for $1,000, explaining that he “wanted to buy bitcoins as pure, shameless speculation.” The speculation didn’t last long: He ended up selling the coins within a month, for a profit of $152. Now, of course, he can make mordant jokes about not holding on to them: as I write this post, those coins would be worth more than $118,000.

Lots of journalists were playing around with buying bitcoin at the time. Kevin Roose (then at New York, now also at the Times) bought one bitcoin (“I thought it might make me a few easy dollars”) and then sold it for a $5 loss. He, too, is mordant on Twitter, as is Kashmir Hill (then of Forbes, now at Gizmodo Media Group), who spent 10.354 bitcoin on a blowout sushi dinner in May 2013. Those coins are worth some $169,000 today.

As all those journalists know, however, it’s really just as well that they didn’t hold on to their coins. Writing first-person articles about using bitcoin for smallish transactions is one thing; being personally invested in bitcoin to the tune of $100,000 or more is something else entirely. In 2018, as bitcoin futures start being traded on established exchanges, the cryptocurrency is undeniably going to be a multi-billion-dollar asset class, and that’s going to raise some pointed questions in the world of journalism.

Most importantly, the days of bitcoin stunt journalism are over. Today, if you write about bitcoin, you can’t ethically own it, any more than you can own shares directly in companies you write about. Journalists covering this beat should not be directly financially invested in bitcoin going up rather than down, especially not when potential bitcoin profits can end up dwarfing their dollar salaries.

Similarly, when journalists talk to and quote any of the thousands of blockchain experts out there, they should make absolutely clear the degree to which those experts are talking their own book and are getting extremely rich off the current cryptocurrency bubble. If it’s hard for a journalist to be objective about something she’s personally invested in, it’s even harder for an expert to talk about bitcoin’s rise without being affected by the fact that it has made her millions of dollars in profit.

These facts need to be spelled out because they’re not obvious. In most journalism, there has been a workable distinction between principals and analysts; you talk to the latter about the former, for instance by phoning up a university professor to ask about the founder of a unicorn company. In that situation, it’s generally assumed that the founder has become rich, while the academic has no financial stake in the company’s success.

With bitcoin, by contrast, no one really has a clue who owns what. A handful of individuals like to talk very loudly about how they bought bitcoin cheap and then made millions, but a lot of people, more sensibly, like to keep such things relatively private. When those people are interviewed, it’s often impossible to know how invested they are, quite literally, in bitcoin’s ongoing price rise.

And let’s not kid ourselves that all the journalists covering bitcoin have refrained, in a high-minded manner, from acquiring any coins themselves. Quite the opposite: Many of the publications covering the blockchain space are quite deliberately staffed by journalists who have long believed that bitcoin, blockchain, and cryptocurrency will transform the world. Insofar as those journalists have now become wealthy through their cryptocurrency holdings, they are going to be more invested in their thesis than ever.

The job of journalism is to enlighten; no one should want to muddy the bitcoin waters even more than they are already. But the web of undisclosed conflicts in the bitcoin world is almost impossible to disentangle, especially since one of the celebrated features of cryptocurrencies is that they can be held secretly. We’ll see more disclosure in 2018 than we have until now. But it won’t be nearly enough.

Felix Salmon is host and editor of Cause & Effect.

Julia Beizer   A longer view on the pivot

Lam Thuy Vo   Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest

Carrie Brown-Smith   Transparency finally takes off

Manoush Zomorodi   Self-help as a publishing strategy

Federica Cherubini   The rise of bridge roles in news organizations

Kelsey Proud   No, no, no

Jared Newman   Venture funding and digital news don’t mix

Joyce Barnathan   It will be harder to bury the news

Lanre Akinola   Making noise is not a strategy

Jennifer Coogan   The future is female

Laura E. Davis   Writing answers before you know the question

Rodney Benson   Better, less read, and less trusted

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity

Emma Carew Grovum   Newsroom culture becomes a priority

Molly de Aguiar   Good journalism won’t be enough

Ruth Palmer   Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities

Michael Kuntz   The only pivot that might work

Francesco Marconi   The year of machine-to-machine journalism

Rubina Madan Fillion   Unlocking the potential of AI

Jassim Ahmad   Thriving on change

Helen Havlak   Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds

Basile Simon   We need better career paths for news nerds

David Skok   Finding an information-life balance

Michelle Garcia   Navigating journalistic transparency

Raju Narisetti   Mirror, mirror on the wall

Kim Fox   Audience teams diversify their approach

Rachel Schallom   Better design helps differentiate opinion and news

Imaeyen Ibanga   Longform video leads the way

Andrew Ramsammy   The year ownership mattered

Cristina Wilson   The year of the Instagram Story

Kathleen McElroy   Building a news video experience native to mobile

Rodney Gibbs   Tech workers turn to journalism

Doris Truong   Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes

Almar Latour   Conquering calm

Steve Grove   The midterms are an opportunity

Alice Antheaume   Are you fluent in AI?

Richard J. Tofel   The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention

Tanya Cordrey   Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention

Joanne McNeil   Gatekeeping the gatekeepers

Aron Pilhofer   We can’t leave the business to the business side any more

Julia B. Chan   Looking for loyalty in all the right places

Niketa Patel   Live journalism comes of age

L. Gordon Crovitz   Serving readers over advertisers

Mi-Ai Parrish   Blockchain and trust

Feli Sánchez   The year for guerrilla user research

Zizi Papacharissi   Women come back

Pablo Boczkowski   The rise of skeptical reading

Ståle Grut   Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks

Kyle Ellis   Let’s build our way out of this

Matt DeRienzo   A recession, then a collapse

Jarrod Dicker   Honesty in advertising

Mariano Blejman   News games rule

Andrew Haeg   The year journalists become relationship builders

Tracie Powell   The muting of underserved voices

C.W. Anderson   The social media apocalypse

Tim Carmody   Watch out for Spotify

Sarah Marshall   Loyalty as the key performance indicator

Jesse Holcomb   Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you

Felix Salmon   Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin

Umbreen Bhatti   The trust problem isn’t new

Jim Brady   With the people, not just of the people

Heather Bryant   Building the ecosystems for collaboration

Craig Newmark   Working together toward sustainable solutions

Vanessa K. DeLuca   Women’s voices take center stage

Neha Gandhi   Filler killers

Alan Soon   The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Seeking trust in fragmented spaces

Sydette Harry   Listen to your corner and watch for the hook

Usha Sahay   Wallets get opened

P. Kim Bui   The reckoning is only beginning

Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg   (Hint: It’s about your brand)

Mary Walter-Brown   Show a little vulnerability

Frédéric Filloux   External forces

Brian Lam   Sketchy ethics around product reviews

Amy King   Let’s amplify visual voice

Trushar Barot   The Jio-fication of India

Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer   Skepticism and narcissism

Nushin Rashidian   Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives

Tamar Charney   We get serious about algorithms

S. Mitra Kalita   The arc of news and audience

Edward Roussel   Eyes, ears, and brains

Jennifer Choi   Standing up for us and for each other

Justin Kosslyn   The year journalists become digital security experts

Carlos Martínez de la Serna   The new journalism commons

Luke O'Neil   The end is already here

Matt Carlson   Attacks on the press will get worse

Jacqui Cheng   Retailers move into content

José Zamora   Revenue-first journalism

Sally Lehrman   Trust comes first

Daniel Trielli   The rich get richer, the poor scramble

Burt Herman   Things get real

Yvonne Leow   The rise of video messaging

Jim Moroney   Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for

Bill Keller   A growing turn to philanthropy

Evie Nagy   Pivot to mobile video frustration

Matt Boggie   The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea

Matt Thompson   Here come the attention managers

Dan Newman   A return to trust

Tanzina Vega   It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic

Nathalie Malinarich   Peak push

Joanne Lipman   Journalists inventing revenue streams

Sam Ford   The year of investing in processes

John Keefe   Scooped by AI

Mira Lowe   The year of the local watchdog

Kinsey Wilson   Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up

Mariana Moura Santos   Think local, act global

Caitria O'Neill   The new court of public opinion

Andrew Losowsky   The year of resilience

Mandy Velez   texting is lit rn, fam

Susie Banikarim   R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)

Damon Krukowski   Reviving the alt-weekly soul

Dannagal G. Young   Stop covering politics as a game

Juliette De Maeyer   A responsible press criticism

Raney Aronson-Rath   Transparency is the antidote to fake news

Jamie Mottram   From pageviews to t-shirts

Errin Haines   At the ballot, it’s time to count black women

Ray Soto   VR reaches the next level

Hossein Derakhshan   Television has won

Rachel Davis Mersey   AI, with real smarts

Pete Brown   Push alerts, personalized

Pia Frey   Address users as individuals

Michelle Ferrier   The year of the great reckoning

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time

Eric Ulken   The year local publishers get smart(er) about change

Charo Henríquez   Training is an investment, not an expense

Jessica Parker Gilbert   Design connects storytelling and strategy

Corey Johnson   The pro-fact resistance

Jake Levine   The return to now

Hannah Cassius   The year of the echo-chamber escapists

Amy Webb   Listen to weak signals

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Publishing less to give readers more

Borja Echevarría   TV goes digital, digital goes TV

Lucas Graves   From algorithms to institutions

Emily Goligoski   Looking beyond news for inspiration

An Xiao Mina   Memes and visuals come to the fore

Debra Adams Simmons   And a woman shall lead them

Amie Ferris-Rotman   More female reporters abroad (please)

Cindy Royal   Your journalism curriculum is obsolete

Monika Bauerlein   The firehose of falsehood

Caitlin Thompson   Podcasting models mature and diversify

Ariana Tobin   Too tired to tap

Renée Kaplan   The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)

Kristen Muller   The year of the voter

Marie Gilot   No assholes allowed

Sam Sanders   Shine the light on ourselves

Nicholas Quah   Stop talking trash about young people

Christopher Meighan   Passive partnership is in the rearview

Dan Shanoff   You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)

Corey Ford   The empire strikes back

Will Sommer   The year local media gets conservative

Vivian Schiller   Pivot to tomorrow

Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy   Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism

Elizabeth Jensen   Show your work

Cory Haik   Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact

Sue Schardt   Jump the niche

Alfred Hermida   Going beyond mobile-first

Nancy Watzman   Know thy TV

Adam Thomas   Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor

Dheerja Kaur   Fun with subscription products

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms

Alastair Coote   The year of self-improvement

Kawandeep Virdee   Zines had it right all along

Mario García   Storytelling finally adapts to mobile

Mike Caulfield   Refactoring media literacy for the networked age

Miguel Castro   The arrival of the impact producer

Mary Meehan   Real lives are at stake in rural areas

Taylor Lorenz   Social and media will split

Monique Judge   Letting black women tell their own stories

Nikki Usher   The year of The Washington Post

Eric Nuzum   Beyond the narrative arc

Paul Ford   Go global

Rick Berke   Value is the watchword

Alexios Mantzarlis   Moving fake news research out of the lab

Claire Wardle   Disinformation gets worse

Sara M. Watson   Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters

Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán   The editorial meeting of the future