It was Ray Bradbury that said predicting the future was easy. You just look around and predict more of the same. But he wasn’t having it.
“To hell with more,” he wrote, “I want better.”
In the area of digital media literacy education, the “more” prediction is easy. There will be more of it. States, provinces, and countries will begin to roll out larger programs. People will be hired. Initiatives will be funded. Consultants will be engaged and new programs designed. Edtech startups, lurching out of recent personalized education failures, will sense money to be extracted from the public purse and pitch last year’s wares with a brand new pivot. 2016’s coding microcredential platform will become 2018’s information literacy solution.
There will be 32 headlines that claim a newly funded company has “solved the information literacy problem,” all dutifully transcribed from the latest Y Combinator press releases. They will use the term “fake news.” The irony of this will be lost on both startup and tech press transcriber.
So that’s the more. But what about the better?
Lost initially in the mad rush to monetize the most recent crisis will be the fact that underneath the new coat of paint many of these solutions are decades old. That’s fine, of course, if it turns out these solutions help folks make sense of the web. Maybe the failure of them is due just to underuse. It could be.
Me, I’m skeptical. I’ve been involved in online literacy for a decade and I’m not convinced “more” does it. Recent studies seem to support this conclusion, finding that an awful lot of highly educated folks, skilled in all sorts of traditional media literacy, are hopelessly lost on the web. (Many of these people are faculty).
Given this, 2018 could be the year that we refactor media literacy, bringing the insights of people with teaching experience together with experts on the current information environment and people (such as fact-checkers) that most closely model target competencies. This project would start by asking what a citizen needs to be able to do online, and what skills, understandings, and dispositions they need to do it. It’d work backwards from there, tapping into the insights of the newly thriving interdisciplinary field of misinformation. It’d make something new, and suited to the purpose in front of us.
Far-fetched? Maybe. But media literacy has always been crisis-driven, and has undergone major revisions to address perceived threats before. The interdisciplinary collaboration that we see the misinformation field currently engaging in is inspiring, and provides a possible model. This could be the year.
Don’t bet on that of course. Always, always, bet on more. But put your heart and soul into achieving better.
One other prediction, on the rise of the right to be informed.
In our mental model of tyranny, Orwell’s 1984 has an outsized influence. The government chirps its preferred narrative repeatedly at the people, monitors their acceptance of it, maintains the only historical record, and bends history and perception to its centralized will. Orwell’s “boot stamping on a face — forever” is always government-issue footwear, the make and shoe size clearly visible.
In Orwell’s world, and indeed in the world of many past totalitarian regimes, the right to speak and the right to be informed — the ability to hear views outside of what the government provided — were inextricably intertwined. The government had monopoly power over narrative, which it both exercised (keeping the population uninformed) and protected (preventing expression of divergent views). Our society, always set up to fight the last war, has tended to see these rights as intertwined.
This model, however, is outdated. Modern totalitarian regimes do not exercise monopoly control over narrative. Rather, they use a variety of technological and organic means to make competing narratives inaccessible to or untrusted by the public. They leverage the use of “patriotic trolling,” as seen in the Philippines, and armies of paid commenters and fake profiles leveraging real participation. In the U.S., the hordes of bots and people who talk like bots invade competing hashtags and disrupt political communication. Weaponized transparency, defended by free speech advocates, is used to overwhelm the public’s capacity to separate fact from fiction, as we saw with the Podesta email “leaks.” Speech — whether automated or organized — is being used strategically to prevent access to information the public needs to govern itself.
In such a world, we will start to see people, out of necessity, peel apart the right to free speech from the right to be informed. The right to be informed will need to take into account, as Zeynep Tufekci has argued, the limits of attention and the way bad information can be used to crowd out good. It will take into account the deleterious effects of information overload, and wrestle with the impact of systemic harassment in wiping out minority voices. This evolved conception of free speech as a right to expression that sometimes conflicts with a parallel right to be informed will begin to form a legal, technical, and educational framework which is better able to defend against the tyranny face instead of the tyranny we remember.
Mike Caulfield heads the Digital Polarization Initiative at the American Democracy Project.
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
AX Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin